![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_kI6-WVzLnd1FbZKG9AXVrASW4E1QGs-U6stBCxHn_spMu-eHW3ymn7M6CltOYT39fnZvxffNRyMZ6Gy6u4pVFKL1UPcC5n2gQLuP7ZAeITJlzGqAUJslCPwg8sU1MjbngG-RNqECV04/s200/esrc.jpg)
Anyway, the Times Higher story is interesting as it's apparent that our unease has been shared by others. Quoting a prof from a Russell Group university, she had 'decided that bids by researchers interested in delivering a serious critique of the evidence base for "happiness initiatives" would not be well received.'
"For a supposedly independent research council, it's a disgracefully biased and loaded specification," she said of the ESRC call. She added that "a number of universities are bidding even though there is a widespread cynicism about it".
"For a supposedly independent research council, it's a disgracefully biased and loaded specification," she said of the ESRC call. She added that "a number of universities are bidding even though there is a widespread cynicism about it".
Elsewhere, another prof suggested that the ESRC was aiming to fund research that was about 'promoting self delusion'.
It's a shame the ESRC didn't answer these criticisms; we'll watch this story with interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment